[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
support for latexmk?
|
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
|
Subject: |
support for latexmk? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:25:16 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi all
In the last couple of days I came again into contact with latexmk (but
for for org-latex-preview, which can be configured using
latexmk+pdf+imagemagick, not sure that latex-preview has this feature)
Be it as it may, I also found using package-list-packages
https://github.com/tom-tan/auctex-latexmk
which is a bit outdated.
So I was wondering whether there was any discussion to which extend
auctex supports the use latexmk. Maybe there was a discussion, but I
missed or forgot it.
Regards
Uwe Brauer
--
I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- support for latexmk?,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- [a rather larger inconvience] (was: support for latexmk?), Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Paul Nelson, 2024/08/17