[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: support for latexmk?
|
From: |
Arash Esbati |
|
Subject: |
Re: support for latexmk? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2024 18:35:58 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
> But so far it is a nice feature
Thanks, maybe you test it a little more and see how AUCTeX manages any
error messages issued by LatexMk and/or LaTeX. I'm not sure how good it
works in that area.
Further, there was a report here about the current implementation not
being optimal[1]. Maybe we have to change `TeX-run-format' to
`TeX-run-TeX' at the end.
> (so is Pauls) maybe at some point his code could be merged into
> AuCTeX?
At some point, we will approach Paul and discuss with him what we
can/want to include into AUCTeX, but that will have to wait a little.
Best, Arash
Footnotes:
[1] https://github.com/tom-tan/auctex-latexmk/pull/40#issuecomment-2208807071
- support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- [a rather larger inconvience] (was: support for latexmk?), Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Paul Nelson, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/18
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/22