auctex-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Parse graphicspath for searching [was: Provide advice to ffap (find-


From: Ikumi Keita
Subject: Re: Parse graphicspath for searching [was: Provide advice to ffap (find-file-at-point) from \input@path?]
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:16:05 +0900

Hi Leo,

Thank you for your cooperation. Have you received the reply from FSF
that tells your assignment process is complete? If not, please wait it
patiently; According to my experience, FSF copyright assignment
process can take several months.

Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW

>>>>> Leo Stein <leo.stein@gmail.com> writes:
> FYI I sent back the signed FSF assignment form on Oct. 7 ... Not sure what
> this means about my proposed patch.

> Best
> Leo

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 1:36 AM Leo Stein <leo.stein@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I agree with you :) I won't let attempting to be perfect stand in the way
>> of being useful.
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024, 01:00 Ikumi Keita <ikumi@ikumi.que.jp> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Leo,
>>> 
>>> >>>>> Leo Stein <leo.stein@gmail.com> writes:
>>> > Probably not, but I didn't want to make any assumptions. One example
>>> might
>>> > be that a user includes a comment just before/after their
>>> > \graphicspath{...} command, reminding themselves of the syntax, e.g.
>>> 
>>> > % The syntax for \graphicspath is
>>> \graphicspath{{path1/}{path2/}{path3/}}
>>> > \graphicspath{{figs/}{../scripts/figs/}}
>>> 
>>> > I now realize that even the \graphicspath command inside the comment
>>> will
>>> > be parsed. Should it be ignored?
>>> 
>>> > I think that LaTeX won't mind extra whitespace or ignored comments
>>> inside a
>>> > graphicspath command, e.g.
>>> 
>>> > \graphicspath{%
>>> >   {figs/}            % my handmade figures
>>> >   {../scripts/figs/} % figures generated by my analysis code
>>> > }
>>> 
>>> > but my current regex won't match this example.
>>> 
>>> Yes, the proposed code doesn't ignore commented \graphicspath, and
>>> doesn't deal with whitespaces and comments between the outer braces. I
>>> think we can still live with it as preliminary work. Don't worry, there
>>> are tons of such simplifications in the current AUCTeX code. But if you
>>> want to elaborate it further, you can take your time.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Ikumi Keita
>>> #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
>>> #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
>>> 
>> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]