[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] (setq TeX-auto-save t) really necessary?

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] (setq TeX-auto-save t) really necessary?
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:49:27 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:

> * Uwe Siart (2005-05-09) writes:
>> But what if I include
>> %%% Local Variables:
>> %%% TeX-master: "masterfile.tex"
>> %%% End:
>> in all slave files instead? Doesn't AUCTeX know about the full document 
>> structure then?
> No.
>> I ask because I work this way each day - and RefTeX does a quite good 
>> job in parsing the whole document. It produces the toc, shows all 
>> labels, and so on. So I thought, AUCTeX will do this as well, doesn't 
>> it?
> No, it doesn't.  But I would not object if somebody implemented this
> as a customizable feature.

AUCTeX can't possibly know about what slaves belong to a master
document.  However, I don't think it actually needs to know that, does
it?  I'd think that all the relevant stuff should be in the master
document (which is supposed to contain the document preamble, isn't

But I don't really know this well.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]