auctex
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] auctex.el.in missing in snapshots


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] auctex.el.in missing in snapshots
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:08:08 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Uwe Siart <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> the ./configure script in current snapshots fails because it can't find
> the file 'auctex.el.in'. Indeed this file is not included in the
> archive.
>
> Environment: MSYS shell on Win2k

I have no idea why that would be, but then I don't know how the
snapshots would be generated.  The CVS log states:

RCS file: /cvsroot/auctex/auctex/auctex.el.in,v
Working file: auctex.el.in
head: 5.2
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 2;     selected revisions: 2
description:
----------------------------
revision 5.2
date: 2005/04/29 12:32:17;  author: dak;  state: Exp;  lines: +4 -4
* auctex.el.in:

* context.el:

* latex.el:

* tex-jp.el:

* tex-site.el.in:

* tex.el:

*  tex-info.el: Remove TeX-doc.

* tex-info.el (Texinfo-mode): Fix type in alias.

* tex-site.el.in (tex-site): Provides are added by Makefile.
Remove them here.
----------------------------
revision 5.1
date: 2005/04/28 05:10:24;  author: dak;  state: Exp;
* tex-site.el.in (TeX-doc): Use AUCTeX-version.

* configure.ac: fiddle with relative paths.

* Makefile.in: several changes to buld structure.

* auctex.el.in (TeX-doc): Startup file source.

[...]

Now don't ask me why the revisions start with 5.1 which is pretty much
insane.  Probably some mixup with options, or some use of C-u as a
prefix which has caused some weird effect.  But regardless of the
crazy large version number, this _is_ a head revision, and not really
an old file, anyway.

Reiner?  I don't know _how_ you are doing the snapshots, but it is
pretty obvious that the right way to do them would be to use
cvs export
in some manner.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]