[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] missing in snapshots

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] missing in snapshots
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:08:08 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Uwe Siart <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
> the ./configure script in current snapshots fails because it can't find
> the file ''. Indeed this file is not included in the
> archive.
> Environment: MSYS shell on Win2k

I have no idea why that would be, but then I don't know how the
snapshots would be generated.  The CVS log states:

RCS file: /cvsroot/auctex/auctex/,v
Working file:
head: 5.2
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 2;     selected revisions: 2
revision 5.2
date: 2005/04/29 12:32:17;  author: dak;  state: Exp;  lines: +4 -4

* context.el:

* latex.el:

* tex-jp.el:


* tex.el:

*  tex-info.el: Remove TeX-doc.

* tex-info.el (Texinfo-mode): Fix type in alias.

* (tex-site): Provides are added by Makefile.
Remove them here.
revision 5.1
date: 2005/04/28 05:10:24;  author: dak;  state: Exp;
* (TeX-doc): Use AUCTeX-version.

* fiddle with relative paths.

* several changes to buld structure.

* (TeX-doc): Startup file source.


Now don't ask me why the revisions start with 5.1 which is pretty much
insane.  Probably some mixup with options, or some use of C-u as a
prefix which has caused some weird effect.  But regardless of the
crazy large version number, this _is_ a head revision, and not really
an old file, anyway.

Reiner?  I don't know _how_ you are doing the snapshots, but it is
pretty obvious that the right way to do them would be to use
cvs export
in some manner.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]