[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 03:52:18 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Michael Forster <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi
>>>The texmf finding problem with MiKTeX remains, right?
>> If somebody can give us a good recipe to put into the configure
>> script, not necessarily.  But it does not write itself.
> Is this the same question I asked in another thread, that kpsepath
> does not exist under MikTeX and thus configure does not find TEXMF
> automatically?
> How about something like
>      TEX=`kpsewhich tex.exe`
>      TEXMF=${TEX%/miktex/bin/tex.exe}

Is the general package layout of MikTeX that?  texmf tree, then
miktex/bin?  Always?  And miktex/bin all in lowercase letters?  We
wont use kpsewhich here, but this might provide a way to figure out
the texmf tree.  And the texmf tree then is called something that ends
in texmf as last path component?

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]