[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Question of a font problem.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Question of a font problem. |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:21:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Adam Johnson" <address@hidden> writes:
> I just have a question of font in AUCTeX. In the following math environment
> $A_\mathrm{med}$
> The font of {med} is normalsize, but it should be scriptsize.
> $A_{\mathrm{med}}$ can give a correct result.
It is actually a bad idea not to include the "argument" of _ in quotes
most of the times since the user rarely known just _what_ may
constitute a single math atom.
> However, both methods produce the same output, but the fontface are
> different. I know that maybe it is difficult to be corrected because
> in $A_\theta{B}$ (not good writing style, but some use this way.) then
> ${B}$ should be normalsize.
>
> Is it a better idea to redefine "_" to "_{}" in AUCTeX and place the
> cursor between "{}" if it is not "\_"?
> Similarly to redefine "^" to "^{}" if it is not "\^"?
You mean, autoinsertion of braces so that the user will be more
tempted to use them?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: [AUCTeX] Question of a font problem.,
David Kastrup <=