[AUCTeX] Re: Minor ConTeXt questions

[Philipp Reichmuth]

Hi,

I wonder what happened to this mail.

Philipp Reichmuth schrieb:
> - Running texexec with '--passon="-interaction=nonstopmode"' apparently 
> doesn't work at least with recent ConTeXt; if ConTeXt hits an error, the 
> process hangs at TeX's ? prompt.  Instead, texexec has a --batchmode 
> parameter that does the job; changing the values

... in ConTeXt-expand-options is straightforward.

> - When running texexec with C-c C-C ConTeXt RET, the output isn't parsed 
> correctly at present; you always.  The regexp in context.el ('^ 
> TeX\\(Exec\\|Util\\)' doesn't match anything because of the initial 
> space.  For me, using 'tuo file saved\nTeXExec | runtime:' instead does 
> the job, but in a hackish sort of way, because unfortunately CoNTeXt 
> currently doesn't produce much meaningful output in --batchmode (besides 
> the return code).  If it hits any errors, this way you only get the 
> information that something is wrong; if you want to know what exactly it 
> is, you have to run it in interactive mode.  I guess one should

... ask the ConTeXt folks if texexec can be made to be more verbose in 
its --batchmode output.

Philipp