[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support
From: |
Joost Kremers |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:30:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.1 |
On Mon, Sep 05 2016, Tobias Berndt wrote:
>> \startblabla
>> \startitem First \stopitem
>> \startitem Second \stopitem
>> \startitem Third \stopitem
>> \stopblabla
>
>>I'm sorry, but that's just horrible
> ... yes, it certainly is! But, you will use these all closing tags
> only if you want to have perfect XML output. In case, you just want to
> have perfect PDFs and standard (X)HTML, you would use simply:
>
>> \startblabla
>> \item First
>> \item Second
>> \item Third
>> \stopblabla
Then what's the difference between "perfect XML" and "standard (X)HTML"?
Isn't proper XHTML "perfect" enough?
And still, isn't the fact that a new \item appears enough reason to
assume that the previous \item should be closed off? It makes sense to
have some way to close an element explicitly, because there are always
edge cases where the parses needs to guess and guesses wrong. But to
require it everywhere?
Anyway, this discussion is veering off-topic...
--
Joost Kremers
Life has its moments
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, (continued)
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Arash Esbati, 2016/09/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Tobias Berndt, 2016/09/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, David Kastrup, 2016/09/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Tobias Berndt, 2016/09/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Arash Esbati, 2016/09/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Tobias Berndt, 2016/09/12
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Joost Kremers, 2016/09/05
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Tobias Berndt, 2016/09/05
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support,
Joost Kremers <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Tobias Berndt, 2016/09/06
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, David Kastrup, 2016/09/05
- Re: [AUCTeX] ConTeXt MkIV Support, Tobias Berndt, 2016/09/05