[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question
From: |
François Patte |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question |
Date: |
Mon, 1 May 2017 14:51:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 |
Le 17/04/2017 à 09:30, Tassilo Horn a écrit :
> François Patte <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Bonjour François,
>
>> I added to my .Xresources file:
>> "Emacs.font-latex-sedate-face.attributeForeground: indianred2" in
>> order to have all LaTeX commands in indianred.
>>
>> But when I use a command like \- for discretionnary hyphen, the whole
>> word after the \- command is turned into indian red, ie. the
>> fontification is not applied only to the command (which is actually in
>> red).
>>
>> For instance: anti\-constitutionnel: \- is in red and constitutionnel
>> in indian red.
>>
>> Is there a way to avoid this?
>
> That's a bug. I just taught font-latex that \-something is not a
> command and should not be highlighted as such.
>
> I also made a new ELPA release but sadly just *before* I read your mail
> and fixed the bug, so it might take a while until the fix becomes
> available (through ELPA at least).
Thank you for the corrections in the last Auctex version, but openning
an old file, when I typed diacritical mark using TeX command for
accented characters, I can see that the problem remains for all these
commands; examples:
m\^eme, \'etant, r\'eit\'er\'ee, S\=uryad\=asa and a lot of others...
So, nowadays, using xelatex and unicode we can avoid this... But for
people using a basic 7bits keyboard it could be nice to correct also
these commands...
Regards.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question,
François Patte <=