autoconf-archive-maintainers | |
[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boost macros use non-portable tac
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
Re: boost macros use non-portable tac |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:26:07 +0200 |
Hi Peter,
> IIUC, 'tac' was introduced to reverse the order of the output from
> 'ls', and I'm thinking that just replacing 'ls' with 'ls -r' would
> suffice, or am I missing something?
well, if '-r' is a sufficiently well supported option to 'ls', then it
sure is an alternative to 'tac'. Would you like to prepare a patch to
make that change?
Take care,
Peter
- boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/24
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Simons, 2012/09/26
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/26
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/26
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Simons, 2012/09/27
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/27
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Simons, 2012/09/29
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/30
- PATCH AX_BOOST_THREAD for OSX [was: boost macros use non-portable tac], Peter Johansson, 2012/09/30
- Re: PATCH AX_BOOST_THREAD for OSX [was: boost macros use non-portable tac], Peter Simons, 2012/09/30