[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Autoconf @ Red Hat
From: |
Hugo Gayosso |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Autoconf @ Red Hat |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:44:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[ removed address@hidden, and address@hidden ]
Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
> | 1) Is address@hidden = address@hidden ?
>
> Yes, it is, but he no longer wants to be related to Autoconf, so you
> can just remove Ben.
Done, I have commented him out from the 'responsibles'.
>
> | 2) In the "submitters" file it says:
> |
> | net:Net Users:net:-1:address@hidden:
> |
> | Which email address should be here? (address@hidden, I
> | guess).
> |
> | If so, who should be receiving emails to autoconf-prs , or is this
> | supposed to go to 'send-pr' ?
>
> autoconf-prs is a mail list reporting all the GNATS activity. Before
> creating a new ML on gnu.org, I would like you to tell us what will be
> the convention. On sources, they use *-prs, indeed.
As far as I know there is no convention, so it is safe to use
autoconf-prs, I have replaced @sources.redhat.com with @gnu.org for it
in the 'responsibles' file.
> | 3) <address@hidden> sends email to: <address@hidden>, while
> | 'akim' on the gnats database 'responsible' file sends email to
> | <address@hidden>. Should I change any of those?
>
> Yes please, have them point to address@hidden
Done.
- --
Hugo Gayosso
Support Free Software
Support the GNU Project
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.gnu-friends.org/~hugo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8o9UUMNObVRBZveYRAvxIAJwOwdSdI8+h5oevbZcVO/Lh+9vqIwCgjPql
yhNCW4oLfNzWIZwVKUDi7tc=
=lTUt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----