[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gnu.org #1700388] Dead Link.
From: |
Therese Godefroy via RT |
Subject: |
[gnu.org #1700388] Dead Link. |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Mar 2021 15:11:39 -0500 |
Le Dim 07 Mar 2021 16:42:12, eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU a écrit :
> On 3/7/21 5:57 AM, Therese Godefroy via RT wrote:
> > Since some people are still using the old manuals, it may be worth
> > fixing them... or not.
>
> I'd say "not". It'd be more hassle than it's worth, including the hassle
> of "rewriting history", which means we'd need some sort of version
> numbering scheme for the old manuals and that would cause further user
> confusion.
>
> If this continues to be a problem we could stop publishing the old
> manuals and publish only the latest release. Not only would this lessen
> our maintenance burden, it would also help prevent people finding the
> old manuals by mistake via Google searches. A bit drastic tho.
>
Le Dim 07 Mar 2021 16:06:53, jim@meyering.net a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021, 5:57 AM Therese Godefroy via RT <
> webmasters-comment@gnu.org> wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for reporting. You're welcome to fix it, but I won't.
>
Hello Paul and Jim,
Thanks for your input.
So everybody agrees that it isn't worth fixing. I gave the
OP the correct link, and told him about version 2.70.
All the best,
Thérèse