RE: more doc. proofreading

[Steven G. Johnson]

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> It's definitely 'et cetera', but I'm not sure it's that desirable to
> spell it out in full.  I've rarely seen it used that way; usually the
> 'etc.' abbreviation is used.

(It is not that uncommon to see it spelled out, but usually it is done so
as "etcetera" and not "et cetera.")  In this case, since the comma was
needed afterwards, I thought "etcetera" looked better (".," combinations
are awkward).

> Perhaps not, but for ellipsis, I believe you should use @dots{} in
> TeX(info).

Ah, good.  Yes, you are supposed to use a special glyph for an ellipsis,
but I didn't know how to do that in TeXinfo.  I'll post a patch.

Steven