[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch |
Date: |
17 Jun 2001 18:59:11 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
On Jun 17, 2001, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
> +# So we check that `ac_env_' and `ac_cv_env_' are consistant. But if
> +# they aren't, be sure to update the `ac_cv_env_' values with the
> +# `ac_env_' ones, otherwise, we would save again the old values in the
> +# cache.
And why would this be wrong? I mean, the cached test results are
consistent with the cached environment variables values. If you just
modify the cached env vars, you're creating an inconsistent cache. I
strongly disagree with this change.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/17
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/18
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/06/19
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/19
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/06/19
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/19
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/19
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Pavel Roskin, 2001/06/20
- Re: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/21
- AC_SYS_RESTARTABLE_SYSCALLS (was: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch), Pavel Roskin, 2001/06/22
- Re: AC_SYS_RESTARTABLE_SYSCALLS (was: fyi-ac-arg-var.patch), Pavel Roskin, 2001/06/25