[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf and OS/2
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf and OS/2 |
Date: |
19 Jun 2001 05:20:09 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
On Jun 18, 2001, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
> # Make a symlink if possible; otherwise try a hard link.
> ln -s $ac_rel_source $ac_dest 2>/dev/null ||
> ln $srcdir/$ac_source $ac_dest ||
> AC_MSG_ERROR([cannot link $ac_dest to $srcdir/$ac_source])
> Now, the question is why we never used `cp -p' here.
I think the answer is that we had never ported autoconf to a platform
in which neither ln -s nor ln would work. Cygwin, for example,
implements ln as cp. I don't see a reason to not add `cp -p',
though, except a little bit of concern about portability of -p.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, (continued)
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Andreas Buening, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/15
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/18
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Andreas Buening, 2001/06/18
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/19
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Andreas Buening, 2001/06/21
- Re: autoconf and OS/2, Tim Van Holder, 2001/06/22
Re: autoconf and OS/2, Akim Demaille, 2001/06/18