|
From: | Kevin Ryde |
Subject: | Re: AC_CHECK_TOOL changes, take 2 |
Date: | Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:39:26 +1000 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
bonzini <address@hidden> writes: > > The only case when this may be > +useful is when you really are not cross-compiling, but only > +building for a least-common-denominator architecture: an example > +is building for @code{i386-pc-linux-gnu} while running on an > address@hidden architecture. The upward case is also useful (but how often it's used I don't know). The downward case one also normally get away with pretending the build system is only i386 or whatever, so it looks like a native build.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |