[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++ |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:26:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
[ ccing Eli, a DOS expert ]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:47:10PM +0100, Keith MARSHALL wrote:
> Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > 3) There is an MSYS build of bash. Though MinGW/MSYS is not ready
> > to run Autoconf, you can use it to unpack a tarball and run ./configure
> > there.
>
> I don't know where you get this idea from. I have been using Autoconf
> 2.59 in the MSYS environment for at least nine months now, and prior
> to that, Autoconf 2.56 for at least the past two years.
I don't know either. :-)
Thank you for your explanation.
> Microsoft added long file name support in Win95 -- the first of the 32-bit
> Windoze releases. The requirement to support 8.3 file names disappeared
> with the demise of MS-DOS, around the same time.
OK. So there is one more question:
Eli: is there any need for ./configure to be compatible with 8.3 filesystems?
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Harald Dunkel, 2005/10/24
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Keith MARSHALL, 2005/10/25
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/25
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Stepan Kasal, 2005/10/26
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/26
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Stepan Kasal, 2005/10/27
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Noah Misch, 2005/10/27
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Paul Eggert, 2005/10/27
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C_O doesn't work with VC++, Keith MARSHALL, 2005/10/25