Re: OpenBSD shell, errexit, and && in if clause

[Paul Eggert]

Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:

> This example isn't right, in that it does not expose the problem, as
> the first command in the AND list should fail.  Did you mean "test -z"
> instead of "test -n" (four instances), or "foo=''", and is there a
> reason to prefer it over the simpler "false"?

I meant foo=''; I installed that.  Thanks.  I thought "false" made the
example unrealistically simple.  (Perhaps I should have left it that
way...)