autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:03:03 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

* Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:37:18PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > The config.status "special magic" from this patch:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2006-05/msg00041.html
> > doesn't work if we don't also use a program with an absolute name.
> 
> What's the bug with it?  Sorry, I don't follow.

Oh, I forgot to explain.  Sorry about that.

cat >configure.ac <<EOF
AC_INIT
AC_PROG_MKDIR_P
AC_CONFIG_FILES(sub/foo)
AC_OUTPUT
EOF
echo "@MKDIR_P@" > sub/foo.in
autoconf
./configure

On GNU/Linux, sub/foo will contain:
../mkdir -p

> > OK to apply this patch to fix both?
> 
> I'd rather not use an absolute name in the normal case.  It makes
> 'make' output look really ugly.  In the normal case, $(MKDIR_P) should
> expand to "mkdir -p", not to "/usr/local/bin/mkdir -p" or whatever.

Well, then you need a different method in the config.status code to
detect whether you need to munge with $MKDIR_P for subdirectories, i.e.,
a different way to detect that MKDIR_P contains a path that is relative
to the build tree.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]