[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath
From: |
Patrick Welche |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:23:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:54:16PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Quoting Paul Eggert <address@hidden>:
>
> > Patrick Welche <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > so the -R made it, and all is well :-)
> > >
> > > I can't check the opposite though: do systems that don't want rpath get
> > > one now?
> >
> > Yes, they probably do. Perhaps the libtool guys can chime in on
> > whether the patch was a good idea.
>
> (Not a libtool developer.)
>
> This looks suspiciously like the -rpath that's been hosing me when I try to
> link
> with a libGL outside the X11 directories (specifically, Mesa built in my home
> directory).
How did you guess? I am trying to build gtk+ and find that dependencies
and rpaths are missing. PATH_XTRA was one. A LDADDS in one of the gtk+
Makefile.ams is the other problem - LDADDS although set correctly isn't
used anywhere - the author probably thought it was the equivalent
to AM_LDFLAGS, but that is for another list...
Cheers,
Patrick
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Patrick Welche, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/17
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/07/20
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Albert Chin, 2006/07/21
- Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Russ Allbery, 2006/07/20
Re: AC_PATH_XTRA and -rpath, Albert Chin, 2006/07/19