[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
From: |
Richard Kenner |
Subject: |
Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:38:26 EST |
> | though I vaguely
> | recall some complaints that you couldn't build v7 Unix if your compiler
> | generated integer overflow traps.
>
> this matches what I've told recently by some people who worked at bell
> labs, in the unix room.
I have recollections of that being the case as well. Moreover, I
think it's also clearly established that PCC always implemented wrapping
semantics. What's less clear (at least to me) is what other existing
practice that the ANSI C committee took into account was at the time.
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", (continued)
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 2006/12/30
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 2006/12/30
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Robert Dewar, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Richard Kenner, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/12/31
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ...", Paul Eggert, 2006/12/31