[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: documentating the recent -fwrapv discussion

From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: documentating the recent -fwrapv discussion
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:30:46 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

This is good documentation.  I see one typo:

> +Despite this requirement by the standard, it has long been common for C
> +code to assume wraparound arithmetic after signed overflow, and all
> +known practical C implementations support some C idioms that assume
> +wraparound signed arithmetic, even if the idioms does not conform

"...idioms does not..." => "...idioms do not..."

> +strictly to the standard.  If your code looks like the following
> +examples it will almost surely work with real-world compilers.

"Ho ho ho. I _so_ enjoy making a fool out of myself."
--Linus, on Christmas Day, 2000

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]