Re: expose m4_PACKAGE_VERSION,m4_version_compare

[Benoit SIGOURE]

On Sep 12, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Eric Blake wrote:

> Benoit SIGOURE <tsuna <at> lrde.epita.fr> writes:
>
> > It looks great.  The name m4_PACKAGE_VERSION is somewhat misleading
> > however (as I understand it, it contains the current version of
> > autoconf right?  So why not name it like m4_AUTOCONF_VERSION or
> > whatever?).
>
> Good point.  There are other m4_PACKAGE_* macros that I did not  
> document;
> basically, they all perform a hard-wired mapping to the contents of  
> the
> PACKAGE_* macros from autoconf's configure script.  I like your  
> idea of making
> the public macro have a more obvious name.  I'll rework my patch  
> accordingly
> (as in, add m4_AUTOCONF_VERSION as the new documented alias, and leave
> m4_PACKAGE_VERSION available, but undocumented).

Sounds good.

Cheers,

--
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part