[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:57:56 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Paolo Bonzini on 1/27/2009 1:03 AM:
> I think that only the following macros must absolutely be defined with
> AC_DEFUN_ONCE: AC_CANONICAL_*, AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS.
>
> Regarding AC_PROG_* macros, I think most of them pose no problems, but I
> agree that this should be left to a future version N years down the
> road.
OK, on the argument that it is not fixing a bug, but just optimizing
performance (even for things like AC_PROG_MKDIR_P, where I've already
proven that it shrinks the size of coreutils), I will not change any of
the AC_PROG on this go-around. I'll post my revised patch for review soon.
> Two other points. First, it's interesting that AC_PROG_LEX is already
> defined with AC_DEFUN_ONCE, and since 2001-08-22 for that matter (I
> don't really understand why).
Yes, I noticed that one myself.
> Second, Eric, I have a doubt: does this idiom work with the new
> AC_DEFUN_ONCE?
>
> AC_PROVIDE_IFELSE([AC_PROG_CXX],
> [_AM_DEPENDENCIES(CXX)],
> [m4_define([AC_PROG_CXX],
> m4_defn([AC_PROG_CXX])[_AM_DEPENDENCIES(CXX)])])dnl
>
> I think so, but I'd rather ask you?
If AC_PROG_CXX has already been expanded, then expand just
_AM_DEPENDENCIES(CXX); otherwise, redefine AC_PROG_CXX so that the next
guy to actually expand it is now expanding the original plus an additional
_AM_DEPENDENCIES(CXX). I don't see anything wrong with that construct
(other than a potentially missing [] prior to _AM_DEPENDENCIES in case
AC_PROG_CXX originally ended in something that looks like a potential
macro name), or any reason why its semantics would have changed.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkl/BNQACgkQ84KuGfSFAYB5IACfaA3lOMbK5pb0+U8F86vOytIH
LfYAn0b5pegyoy68k5xyBmhXc8pbcU36
=Jlpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Eric Blake, 2009/01/26
- Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Eric Blake, 2009/01/26
- Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/27
- Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/27
- Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Eric Blake, 2009/01/27
Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Eric Blake, 2009/01/28