[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:13:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) |
> More and more, I get the impression that my m4sugar code looks like black
> magic
> to the casual onlooker. Apologies to those who think I don't comment my code
> enough for all the tricks I pull off.
This one definitely does, usually I can follow you though.
What was wrong with the simpler definition used for gnulib? :-) Did you
measure any actual performance change?
Paolo
Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics, Eric Blake, 2009/01/28
- Re: AC_DEFUN_ONCE semantics,
Paolo Bonzini <=