[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:45:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28) |
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:04:52AM CET:
> Here's an updated version of patch 2/3 of the previous post; I realized
> that ${a+b} should not be treated as a simple indirection, and added some
> documentation. Patch 1/3 and 3/3 are unchanged.
This patch causes a number of testsuite regressions. The AS_BOX patch
has a typo s/@var/@ovar/ in the manual causing a texinfo warning.
While working on AS_LITERAL_IF, you might want to fix the typo near the
beginning of the description:
# If EXPRESSION has shell indirections ($var or `expr`), expand
# IF-LITERAL, else IF-NOT-LITERAL.
That should be "has no shell indirections".
If you're really motivated, then you could also look into this code
snippet taken from the manual:
header="sys/some file.h"
AS_TR_SH([HAVE_$header])=yes
if test "x$HAVE_sys_some_file_h" = xyes; then echo "Have it!"; fi
which has been broken presumably by one of the earlier AS_LITERAL_IF
changes already. (This is not a recent regression, so feel free to
ignore right now.)
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Eric Blake, 2010/03/01
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Eric Blake, 2010/03/02
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Eric Blake, 2010/03/02
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/03/03
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Eric Blake, 2010/03/03
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/03/04
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Eric Blake, 2010/03/04
- Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/03/04
Re: unoptimized autoconf generated code, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/03/28