[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] docs: mention $MAKE during configure |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:22:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
On 01/03/2013 03:10 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 10:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Based on a suggestion from Bob Friesenhahn:
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2013-01/msg00017.html
>>
>> * doc/install.texi (Defining Variables): Mention that MAKE
>> can be overridden, and the caveats that come with setting it.
>> +Another variable to be aware of is @env{MAKE}; many packages allow this
>> +to be set during @command{configure} in order to request the use of an
>> +alternative @command{make} implementation (such as GNU make, which is
>> +often present as @command{gmake}). However, once an alternative is
>> +chosen, the resulting Makefile may no longer work with the generic
>> address@hidden, so you must make sure to consistently use your
>> +alternative make.
>> +
> s/make/@command{make}/?
Or maybe s/make/$MAKE/?
>
> Apart from that possible nit, ACK from me.
I'll see if anyone else chimes in with a wording suggestion in the next
24 hours or so, then push. We will then see if the gnulib autoupdate
picks it up, or if I will have to give it a kick to find the new INSTALL.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature