[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf
From: |
Lars Hecking |
Subject: |
Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:34:02 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.12i |
Akim Demaille writes:
>
> I think we addressed the most serious bugs. I propose we plan 2.49b
> this Friday. Let's work on the remaining serious bugs, but even if
> there are some left, let's snapshot, too many people are waiting for a
> better snapshot than 2.49a.
>
> So please, if you happen to use a funny environment (which includes
> Ultrix, AIX 3, HP/UX, SunOS 4), please give a try to the test suite!
The test suite takes hours on some systems ...
Solaris 7, IRIX 6.3, DU 4.0F are fine.
HP-UX 9.05 says "All 174 tests were successful (2 ignored)", but
67. ./syntax.at:27 ignored near `syntax.at:27'
113. ./syntax.at:73 ignored near `syntax.at:73'
SunOS 4.1.4 is still running ... so far
67. ./syntax.at:27 FAILED near `syntax.at:27'
80. ./syntax.at:40 FAILED near `syntax.at:40'
- Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/29
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf,
Lars Hecking <=
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/29
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Lars Hecking, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Lars Hecking, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Jim Meyering, 2000/11/30
- Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
Re: Call for testing CVS Autoconf, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30