[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) |
Date: |
14 Dec 2000 10:17:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <address@hidden> writes:
Mo> Boy, the problems with these macros just don't stop. I have now
Mo> re-discovered that when you do not include a call to AC_OBJEXT or
Mo> AC_EXEEXT, automake acts differently.
Right. Do not remove them until Automake is fixed. They are defined
to nothing for this reason.
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, (continued)
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, akim, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/12
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/13
- AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/13
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Mo DeJong, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/14
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again), Akim Demaille, 2000/12/15