[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.13 issue with AC_PROG_CXX

From: Alexandre Oliva
Subject: Re: 2.13 issue with AC_PROG_CXX
Date: 23 Feb 2001 18:13:42 -0300
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)

On Feb 22, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <address@hidden> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva writes:
>> I wish all of AC_PROG_CC, AC_PROG_CXX, etc, would have variants or
>> extra arguments that would cause them to be non-fatal in case a
>> compiler isn't found.

> How about AC_PROG_CC([list], [ACTION-IF-NO]), where ACTION-IF-NO defaults
> to the current AC_MSG_ERROR?

I like it.

Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden,}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden,}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]