[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada)
From: |
Tim Van Holder |
Subject: |
Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada) |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:43:07 +0200 |
> Almost all of the spam I get these days comes directly from gnu.org.
Same here.
> > Can advertisers
> > and bulk spammers be removed?
>
> Officially, no.
>
> After sending similar complaints months ago (Jan 23, 2001) to the FSF I
> just finally tonight got an "official" reply from the vice president of
> the FSF, Bradley Kuhn, stating (in a style typical of RMS actually) that
> they wouldn't block any e-mail, especially not based on third party RBLs
> and the like, because they might accidentally once in a blue moon block
> one poor fool's legitimate message because his MTA was accidentally
> mis-configured and accidentally became an open relay or some such. The
> FSF folks don't seem to realise that everyone knows how to resend a
> message once they've either fixed their mailer or chosen a new service
> provider who takes more careful care of their mailers.
I agree with the FSF on this one - better let through 10 spams than block
1 important mail; similar to your argument, most everyone on gnu.org
mailing lists will also know how to configure their mailer to filter out
potential spam.
> Oddly this policy of theirs to freely re-distribute all spam to all of
> their mailing list subscribers isn't clearly stated on their web site or
> on the subscription confirmation messages they send out.
Nor does it say they block spam.
> Personally I'm going to find other forums which are managed in a much
> more responsible way and which treat their intended community with far
> more care and respect than the FSF has come to do. I will soon be
> unsubscribing from all public gnu.org mailing lists on which I continue
> to receive spam. I encourage everyone else to do likewise. If everyone
> leaves it won't be very hard at all to find willing hosts for alternate
> forums in which free software topics can be discussed without intrusion
> from known spammers, open relays, and such. In fact I'd hope most such
> new lists will be set up so that only subscribers may post freely to
> them. If the list managers should wish to sort through unsolicited
> postings by non-subscribers and forward on only the non-spam then they'd
> obviosly be welcome to do the job!
It seems likely things will move to savannah.gnu.org soon enough; with the
forums, bug tracking, etc. available there, I'm not sure if the mailing
lists are still needed.
- Get your share of $1.4 million!, JackPot City, 2001/04/06
- Re: Get your share of $1.4 million!, D. Stimits, 2001/04/06
- Re: Get your share of $1.4 million!, Greg A. Woods, 2001/04/07
- Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada),
Tim Van Holder <=
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Paul D. Smith, 2001/04/07
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Russ Allbery, 2001/04/07
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), D. Stimits, 2001/04/07
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Greg A. Woods, 2001/04/07
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Paul D. Smith, 2001/04/08
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Esben Haabendal Soerensen, 2001/04/09
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Greg A. Woods, 2001/04/07
- RE: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Tim Van Holder, 2001/04/08
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Mike Castle, 2001/04/09
- Re: Spam, Bacon, Eggs & Spam (was: Re: yada $1.4M yada), Jürgen A. Erhard, 2001/04/18