[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release next week?
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: Release next week? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:12:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:19:40PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote:
> Check out this snippet from Automake's TODO file:
>
> rewrite in guile (RMS request)
Is this on Automake's TODO list for technical reasons or
political ones? (So call me a cynic, but "RMS request" is pretty
suggestive :-)
If it's political, then:
- how likely is it to actually happen?
- is it wise to make a decision for the wrong reasons, just
because they did?
NB: I'm NOT asserting that Guile would be a bad choice; I don't
know enough about it to have a meaningful opinion. But it should
be chosen for a better reason than political pressure (even if
the pressure was applied indirectly, ie. to another project).
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
- Re: Release next week?, (continued)
- Re: Release next week?, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Russ Allbery, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Morten Eriksen, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Russ Allbery, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?,
Eric Siegerman <=
- Re: Release next week?, Tom Tromey, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Eric Siegerman, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Bob Proulx, 2001/04/10
- Re: Release next week?, Esben Haabendal Soerensen, 2001/04/11
- Re: Release next week?, Paul Eggert, 2001/04/11
Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2001/04/10