[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.49e problems with gcc
From: |
Matthew Schalit |
Subject: |
Re: 2.49e problems with gcc |
Date: |
Wed, 09 May 2001 13:30:53 -0700 |
Thomas !
"Thomas E. Dickey" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Matthew Schalit wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I raised this problem once before, where I can't
> > boostrap CVS gcc using autoconf 2.49e
> >
> > Gcc builds just fine with 2.13.
> >
> > Summary:
> > ---------
> > autoconf -l . gets run and fails with a gm4
> > recursion limit of 250 exceeded.
>
> check/see if it (gcc's configure script) uses changequote().
You found it. Configure.in is loaded with changequote() calls.
> That feature is broken in the current alpha versions of autoconf,
> has been reported a few times (and shows up with this symptom).
Something broken? Is it to be fixed before 2.50?
> --
> T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
> http://dickey.his.com
> ftp://dickey.his.com
Thanks,
Matt
- 2.49e problems with gcc, Matthew Schalit, 2001/05/09
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Thomas E. Dickey, 2001/05/09
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc,
Matthew Schalit <=
- RE: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/09
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Thomas Dickey, 2001/05/09
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/10
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/10
- RE: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/10
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/10
- RE: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/10
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/11
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/11
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/11