Re: Further on gcc-3.0 sparc-solaris bootstrap failure

[Phil Edwards]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:09:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > The libobjc/configure script in the cvs archive is not the same as
[...]
> The blank line contains AC_EXEEXT in configure.in.  Since AC_EXEEXT is
> run by default by default by autoconf 2.50, the duplicate expands to
> nothing, which breaks.
> 
> For backward compatibility, autoconf's AC_EXEEXT (and any other
> duplicate-discarded macro, for that matter) should probably be
> expanded to `:', not nothing, so that constructs as above keep on
> working.

I was wondering if libstdc++ was the only one running into this problem.

My local tree contains this exact same fix, as part of my 2.50 experiments.
I won't be checking any of them in until after the 15th, though, since
we're trying to keep the trunk and branch as close together as possible
(lockstep, in theory).


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.