autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 03:26:51 -0800 (PST)

> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:30:41 -0500
> From: Thomas Dickey <address@hidden>

> > > I just upgraded from autoconf-2.13 to autoconf-2.52 and either I
> > > have done something incredibly stupid (an always present
> > > possibility) or the 2.52 version does its thing extremely slowly.
> > 
> > It's the latter.
> 
> there were claims on this mailing list that 2.50 was 3 times faster than
> 2.13 (so you're saying that 2.52x is ~60 times slower than 2.50)

I don't know what the 3x claim was about, but "make check" is definitely
slower in 2.52 than in 2.13.  If you say 60x slower, I'll believe you.
The testing method has changed, and there are more tests.

This doesn't mean "autoconf" is slower, or that "configure" is slower;
only that "make check" is slower.  But my impression is also that
autoheader and autoconf are slower in 2.5x.  I haven't measured it though.

> > You need to run "autoconf" on a faster machine.  Sorry.  (At least
> > "configure" hasn't slowed down much.  :-)
> 
> can you quantify that?

I haven't measured it; I'm just giving you my subjective impression.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]