Re: AC_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED in cross-compilation

[Earnie Boyd]

Russ Allbery wrote:

> Paul D Smith <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I notice that the AC_FUNC_SETVBUF_REVERSED macro has no option for how
> > it behaves during cross-compilation.
>
> Isn't this the macro about which there was general consensus here a while
> back that the likelihood of any system still existing with this problem
> (which was supposedly a bug in a particular software release that was
> later fixed) was so low as to not be worth worrying about?

Well, I was about to ask for a list of which systems are broken and suggest
that a better solution would be to make the value hardcoded based on a filter
of that list rather than trying to determine it via executable testing.

Earnie.