[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backward compatability of tools
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: backward compatability of tools |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 05:18:03 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, 22 Feb 2003, Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Thomas E. Dickey" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > changes were made to autoconf
>
> What changes are you talking about, exactly?
>
> > which made it incompatible with known, widely-used versions of
> > Bourne shell
>
> Which versions of the Bourne shell are you talking about here, exactly?
If I chose to waste my time arguing with you, I'd refer back to the
mailing list archive from early last year, when this was first discussed
and dismissed.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Re: backward compatability of tools, (continued)
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Eric Siegerman, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Bruce Korb, 2003/02/19
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Roger Leigh, 2003/02/20
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, John Burger, 2003/02/21
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/02/22
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Paul Eggert, 2003/02/23
- Re: backward compatability of tools, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/02/24