[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC
From: |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:56:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.1i |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:42:16PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:08:19PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > I think the easiest way for me to do this is simply to locally reset
> > > the warnings-are-errors flag for AC_PREPROC_IFELSE. I don't suppose
> > > you're interested in making this an exported feature?
> >
> > If by "exported feature" you mean "documented for Autoconf" then I'm
> > interested in it. It's a bit esoteric, but if GCC ran into the
> > problem, other people might too.
>
> Well, if I were going to document this feature, I'd do it like this. I
> didn't bother to add the C++ version since I expect that to be less
> useful.
>
> What do you think?
Any comments on this? I need to settle on a solution to use in GCC
until an updated autoconf is available.
> 2003-09-15 Daniel Jacobowitz <address@hidden>
>
> * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler Characteristics): Document
> AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR.
> * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR): New macro.
> (_AC_CHECK_HEADER_MONGREL): Don't warn about inconsistency if
> the preprocessor is set to give errors for any warning.
>
> Index: doc/autoconf.texi
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/doc/autoconf.texi,v
> retrieving revision 1.757
> diff -u -p -r1.757 autoconf.texi
> --- doc/autoconf.texi 2 Sep 2003 19:13:59 -0000 1.757
> +++ doc/autoconf.texi 16 Sep 2003 02:36:34 -0000
> @@ -5297,7 +5297,17 @@ extension.
> Some preprocessors don't indicate missing include files by the error
> status. For such preprocessors an internal variable is set that causes
> other macros to check the standard error from the preprocessor and
> -consider the test failed if any warnings have been reported.
> +consider the test failed if any warnings have been reported. Otherwise
> +warnings are permitted unless @code{AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR} is specified.
> address@hidden defmac
> +
> address@hidden AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR
> address@hidden
> address@hidden CPP
> +If this macro is used, warnings from the preprocessor will be treated
> +as errors even if the preprocessor reports errors correctly. This is useful
> +for avoiding headers which generate mandatory warnings, such as deprecation
> +notices.
> @end defmac
>
>
> Index: lib/autoconf/c.m4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/lib/autoconf/c.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.182
> diff -u -p -r1.182 c.m4
> --- lib/autoconf/c.m4 3 Sep 2003 00:35:52 -0000 1.182
> +++ lib/autoconf/c.m4 16 Sep 2003 02:36:34 -0000
> @@ -419,6 +419,12 @@ AC_SUBST(CPP)dnl
> AC_LANG_POP(C)dnl
> ])# AC_PROG_CPP
>
> +# AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR
> +# ------------------
> +# Treat warnings from the preprocessor as errors.
> +AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR],
> +[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CPP])dnl
> +ac_c_preproc_warn_flag=yes])# AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR
>
> # AC_LANG_COMPILER(C)
> # -------------------
> Index: lib/autoconf/headers.m4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/lib/autoconf/headers.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.34
> diff -u -p -r1.34 headers.m4
> --- lib/autoconf/headers.m4 22 May 2003 15:17:06 -0000 1.34
> +++ lib/autoconf/headers.m4 16 Sep 2003 02:36:35 -0000
> @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ AC_PREPROC_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE(address@hidden:@i
> AC_MSG_RESULT([$ac_header_preproc])
>
> # So? What about this header?
> -case $ac_header_compiler:$ac_header_preproc in
> - yes:no )
> +case
> $ac_header_compiler:$ac_header_preproc:$ac_[]_AC_LANG_ABBREV[]_preproc_warn_flag
> in
> + yes:no: )
> AC_MSG_WARN([$1: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the
> preprocessor!])
> AC_MSG_WARN([$1: proceeding with the compiler's result])
> ac_header_preproc=yes
> ;;
> - no:yes )
> + no:yes:* )
> AC_MSG_WARN([$1: present but cannot be compiled])
> AC_MSG_WARN([$1: check for missing prerequisite headers?])
> AC_MSG_WARN([$1: see the Autoconf documentation])
>
>
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
- RE: Bugs encountered updating GCC, (continued)
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/09/11
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/12
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/09/15
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC,
Daniel Jacobowitz <=
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/23
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2003/09/24
- Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Paul Eggert, 2003/09/24
RE: Bugs encountered updating GCC, Joseph D. Wagner, 2003/09/12