[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: configure.lineno?
From: |
Richard Dawe |
Subject: |
Re: configure.lineno? |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:55:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031031 |
Hello.
Kevin Ryde wrote:
Eric Sunshine <address@hidden> writes:
[snip]
All the DOS ports (djggp, mingw and cygwin) are quite recent and all
based on gnu tools, so are generally untroubled by portability
problems.
Latest for DJGPP ports: autoconf 2.57, automake 1.7.6, libtool 1.5.
automake works out-of-the-box. Later automake 1.7.x should work with
DJGPP, but I think 1.7.8 is the last one I tested.
autoconf has a few small patches. These made it into CVS after 2.57, but
I have no tested autoconf CVS with DJGPP for 9 months and I have no
plans to.
libtool has a few patches that made it into libtool CVS after 1.5. I
haven't tested libtool with DJGPP since 1.5 was released.
(Although this does not mean that we shouldn't fix it.)
Actually, I think it does mean that. Ie. it works fine, and good
reason to believe it will always, so no need to do anything.
If config.status.lineno was introduced post-autoconf 2.57, then it may
not work with DJGPP.
I did not have time to test autoconf, automake, libtool much on
DOS/Windows systems with only short filename support, so I have no idea,
if they work on those systems.
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/ ]
"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone."
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek
- Re: configure.lineno?, (continued)
Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/06
Re: configure.lineno?, bonzini, 2004/01/07
Re: configure.lineno?, Eric Sunshine, 2004/01/10