[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compile order of LDFLAGS and LIBS
From: |
Brian White |
Subject: |
Re: compile order of LDFLAGS and LIBS |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 08:12:39 -0500 |
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Brian White wrote:
> [snip]
> > > I tried setting the LIBS variable to "-lc" on the command line (while
> [snip]
>
> > That sounds like a bug.
> FWIW: Having to explicitly pass -lc qualifies as a bug in their compiler ;)
I thought about that. I figured that it was done to prevent accidental
inclusion of the c library (which is dependant upon the kernel) when you
may be compiling stand-alone code like bootloaders and such.
But I'm just guessing.
Brian
( address@hidden )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Everything that can be invented already has been." --U.S. Patent Office, 1899
Re: compile order of LDFLAGS and LIBS, Ralf Corsepius, 2004/01/22
- Re: compile order of LDFLAGS and LIBS,
Brian White <=