[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C99 support
From: |
Paul Jarc |
Subject: |
Re: C99 support |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:18:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Roger Leigh <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
>> Is C99 really 100% upward compatible with the previous version of the
>> standard, or is it possibly more strict and include type changes which
>> might impact library ABIs?
>
> I believe that it's entirely compatible, providing you don't use the
> new datatypes.
You might use them without knowing it. E.g., in C90, size_t fits in
unsigned long, but in C99, it may not.
paul
- Re: C99 support, (continued)
- Re: C99 support, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Roger Leigh, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Roger Leigh, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Austin Schutz, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support,
Paul Jarc <=
- Re: C99 support, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/30