[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
From: |
Roger Leigh |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99 |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:17:19 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> "Steven G. Johnson" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (Which begs the question: shouldn't AC_PROG_CC_STDC be renamed to
>> AC_PROG_CC_C89, for consistency?)
>
> Yes, and AC_PROG_CC_STDC should refer to the best (typically, latest)
> C standard. That is, AC_PROG_CC_STDC should attempt to set the
> compiler into C99 mode, and failing that should attempt to set it in
> C89 mode. So Roger, please make that part of the next revision for
> your patch.
Sure.
> Also, Roger you'll need to get papers signed for your contribution
> to Autoconf. Have you already started the ball rolling on this?
> If not, I can send you the initial forms.
I haven't. If you could send me the forms, that would be great.
Please could you allow it to include all future autoconf contributions
as well?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
- AC_PROG_CC_C99, Roger Leigh, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Steven G. Johnson, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/01
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99,
Roger Leigh <=
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Akim Demaille, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Noah Misch, 2004/12/02
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/02