[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Does hand editing of "config.h" make sense?
From: |
Bernd Jendrissek |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Does hand editing of "config.h" make sense? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:23:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Keith MARSHALL wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote, quoting me:
> > Unfortunately, while the user is able to add definitions, I am not
> > aware of a way to remove definitions other than to edit the
> > configured header files.
>
> And, as Stepan has already noted, the ability to exclude definitions,
> which configure has already added, could be potentially *more* useful
> than adding those which configure thinks you shouldn't; IME, an
> autoconf generated configure doesn't usually get this wrong!
You mean you want a two-way config.h pattern like this?
/* Define to 1 if you have <risky/header.h> */
/* #undef HAVE_RISKY_HEADER_H */
#ifdef HAVENT_RISKY_HEADER_H
#undef HAVE_RISKY_HEADER_H
#endif
[This must be a new record for responding to old messages. :]
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: RFC: Does hand editing of "config.h" make sense?,
Bernd Jendrissek <=