[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conditionally using libtool
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: conditionally using libtool |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:50:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Hi Russ,
* Russ Allbery wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:41:39PM CEST:
>
> Libtool is painfully, *painfully* slow,
Yes. I know.
> which is why use of it is
> conditional in INN. The approach that we're using required figuring out
> what macros to call first, but it works well enough that I'll keep using
> it until someone comes up with something better. It's certainly better
> than the speed hit from using libtool unconditionally.
Which is fine. All I want to avoid is that anyone using this approach
comes and complains when it breaks with the next Libtool release.
Cheers,
Ralf
- conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/28
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Russ Allbery, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Bob Rossi, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Russ Allbery, 2006/04/29
- Re: conditionally using libtool,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: conditionally using libtool, Russ Allbery, 2006/04/30