[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?
From: |
Tim Post |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:51:11 +0800 |
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 00:36 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I recall having to deal with this
> > issue on fairly recent systems in the 1996-98 timeframe so 'int'
> > didn't just go away because ANSI C said so.
>
> Yes, absolutely; it took quite some time for those old systems to die
> off. But they have been dead for at least a decade. It's time to
> move on.
No, no, no! This should be a special 'checking for ..' encased in ascii
roses in memory of those systems!
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Cheers,
--Tim
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, (continued)
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/07
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/07
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Harlan Stenn, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?,
Tim Post <=
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/06/11
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Russ Allbery, 2008/06/10