[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of AC_TRY_EVAL broken
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: use of AC_TRY_EVAL broken |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:28:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> a suggestion for a new name: AC_EVAL_IFELSE.
There's actually two cases to consider, if you want to make it easy to use
for the developer:
- the case of a command that should be executed and logged,
- the case of a variable that contains a command that should be executed and
logged,
If the second one is AC_EVAL_IFELSE, what would be the name of the first one
(without EVAL)?
Bruno