Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 06 April 2009 22:25:12 Eric Blake wrote:
> Now for a question - right now, m4_default([$1], [$2]) is a nice shorthand
> for m4_ifval([$1], [$1], [$2]); is there any reason to create a shorthand
> for m4_ifnblank([$1], [$1], [$2]) that likewise only needs two arguments?
>  And if so, what to call it?

m4_default_blank([$1], [$2]) seems like a logical extension
-mike

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.