[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL |
Date: |
Thu, 14 May 2009 07:25:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Stefan Bienert wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:05:35PM CEST:
>
> > Accepting an initial value by the user from the command line or the
> > environment, as I wrote earlier. Sorry for the being terse.
>
> Oh, this would be neat. Where's the problem with not initialising SB_FOOS?
There is no problem with it. But you're inconsistent if you
- accept an initial value,
- change that value during configure unconditionally (i.e., without
taking into account the initial value),
- and save the final value at the end of configure, to be reused as
initial value for the next configure run.
Cheers,
Ralf
- AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/12
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Message not available
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/15
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Eric Blake, 2009/05/13