[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LD not precious?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: LD not precious? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:20:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28) |
* Philip A. Prindeville wrote on Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:28:02PM CET:
> On 01/14/2010 12:49 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Philip A. Prindeville wrote on Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:35:59PM CET:
> >> Because I'm encountering Makefiles that call $(LD) directly, and
> >> default LD to "ld" unless you explicitly override it (and not setting
> >> it to $(CC)).
> >
> > Then that is a simple portability issue you should take up with the
> > authors of those Makefiles' input files. They should add something like
> > AC_CHECK_TOOL([LD], [ld])
> >
> > to their configure.ac, just like it is necessary to use AC_PROG_CC in
> > order to use $CC.
> And that will do the @LD@ substitution as well?
Yes.
And the *_TOOL will then cause the right thing to happen if you
./configure --host=foo-bar-alias
(i.e., try foo-bar-alias-ld first, just like with $CC).
Cheers,
Ralf
- LD not precious?, Philip A. Prindeville, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Philip A. Prindeville, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Philip A. Prindeville, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: LD not precious?, Philip A. Prindeville, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Eric Blake, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Philip A. Prindeville, 2010/01/14
- Re: LD not precious?, Eric Blake, 2010/01/14